• Chanasak Hathaiareerug Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital
  • Niksa Tanongsakmontri Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Bhuddasothorn Hospital
Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome, Median nerve, Nerve conduction velocity


Background: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is the most prevalent type of compressive neuropathy. At present, electrodiagnosis is considered the gold standard in diagnosing CTS. However, no clear cutoff point has been established regarding the diagnostic value of the median nerve conduction velocity, across the carpal tunnel area, among patients with CTS.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the cutoff point for patients’ median nerve conduction velocity (NCV), to diagnose CTS among suspected patients, which is determined using electrical stimulations conducted across the carpal tunnel area. The present study also aimed to determine the diagnostic value of the median nerve conduction velocity across the carpal tunnel area, compared with the standard method.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 56 participants (106 wrists) suspected of CTS. Motor and sensory NCV across the carpal tunnel was investigated to yield diagnostic value of CTS compared with the standard technique.

Results: The optimal cutoff point in diagnosing CTS using the wrist to midpalm conduction velocity, was equation 40 m/s (with a sensitivity of 87.04% and specificity of 87.18%) for the sensory nerve conduction study, and equation 35 m/s (with a sensitivity of 88.06% and specificity of 89.74%) for the motor nerve conduction study.

Conclusion: Our study determined that the optimal cutoff conduction velocities for CTS diagnosis, using the wrist-to-midpalm electrical stimulation method, was equation 40 m/s for the sensory nerve, and equation 35 m/s for the motor nerve.


Download data is not yet available.


Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I.Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999; 282: 153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.2.153

Katz JN, Larson MG, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Validation of surveillance case definition of carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Pub Health 1991; 8: 189-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.81.2.189

Werner RA. Evaluation of work-related carpal tunnel syndrome. J Occup Rehabil 2006; 16: 207-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9026-3

Kimura J. A method for determining median nerve conduction velocity across the carpal tunnel. J Neurol Sci. 1978; 38: 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(78)90240-X

Jablecki CK, Andary MT, Floeter MK, Miller RG, Quartly CA, Vennix et al. Practice parameter: Electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Report of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology 2002:58: 1589-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.58.11.1589

Chen S, Andary M, Buschbacher R, Toro DD, Smith B, So Y, et.al. Electrodiagnostic reference values for upper and lower limb nerve conduction studies in adult population. Muscle Nerve 2016; 54: 371-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25203

Sucher BM, Schreiber AL. Carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 25. 2014; 229-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2014.01.004

Wang L. Electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2013; 24: 67-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2012.09.001

Werner RA, Andary M. Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. AANEM monograph: Muscle Nerve 2011; 44: 597-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.22208

Chang MH, Liu LH, Lee YC, et. al. Comparison of sensitivity of transcarpal median motor conduction velocity and conventional conduction techniques in electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117: 984-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.015

Walters RJ, Murray NM. Transcarpal motor conduction velocity in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 200; 24: 966-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.1096

Preston DC, Shapiro BE. Electromyography and neuromuscular disorders: Clinicalelectrophysiological-ultrasound correlations. 4th ed. London: Elsevier; 2021.

Stevens JC. AAEE minimonograph #26: The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1987; 10: 99-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880100202

Eftekharsadat B, Ahadi T, Raissi GR, et. al. Validity of current electrodiagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Med J Islamic Republic Iran 2014: 1-7.

Stevens JC. AAEM minimograph#26. The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1997; 20: 1477-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199712)20:12<1477::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO;2-5

Ongun N, Oguzhanoglu A. Comparison of the nerve conduction parameters in proximally and distally located muscles innervated by the bundles of median and ulnar nerves. Med Princ Pract 2016; 25: 466-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000447742

Gunnarsson LG, Amilon A, Hellstrand P, et. al. The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Sensitivity and specificity of some clinical and electrophysiological tests. J Hand Surg Br 1997; 22: 34-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-7681(97)80011-3

Mallik A, Weir AI. Nerve conduction studies: essentials and pitfalls in practice. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76 (Suppl 2): ii23-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.069138

Campbell WW Jr, Ward LC, Swift TR. Nerve conduction velocity varies inversely with height. Muscle Nerve 1981; 4: 520-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880040609

Midpalm stimulation site
How to Cite
Hathaiareerug C, Tanongsakmontri N. DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF MEDIAN NERVE CONDUCTION VELOCITY ACROSS WRIST AMONG PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME. J Southeast Asian Med Res [Internet]. 2023May13 [cited 2023Jun.5];70:e0159. Available from: https://www.jseamed.org/index.php/jseamed/article/view/159
Original Articles